New Snap Spectacles hands-on: Worth it?




The new Snap Spectacles are now slimmer, water-resistant, and take photos. But that might not be enough. Casey Newton reports. Subscribe: https://goo.gl/G5RXGs

Check out our full video catalog: https://goo.gl/lfcGfq
Visit our playlists: https://goo.gl/94XbKx
Like The Verge on Facebook: https://goo.gl/2P1aGc
Follow on Twitter: https://goo.gl/XTWX61
Follow on Instagram: https://goo.gl/7ZeLvX
Read More: http://www.theverge.com

source

49 Comments

  1. If they let you record for longer and also at a 16:9 aspect ratio these could actually be used outside of Snapchat. But paying $150 just to open your Snapchat capability is a waste.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If I’ve to watch a 5 min and still don’t really think there’s anything new, then there isn’t.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gotta give sam sheffer a shout-out for the footage

    ReplyDelete
  4. He looks like the Beta version of Rhett from GMM

    ReplyDelete
  5. The photos look terribly distorted. Not very useful.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why is this guy so cranky?

    ReplyDelete
  7. They look very similar and that means they’re both ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "I was a fan of the original spectacles" lol!

    ReplyDelete
  9. People won't wear these because round glasses look ugly on most face shapes (including this reviewer). They should have put these cameras on something similar to Ray-Ban Wayfarer or Aviator frames.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Was that @SamSheffer at the end? 😜

    ReplyDelete
  11. Snapchat sealed its fate with the horrible update.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Its performance seems to be snappy

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't think it is different from v1 but I hope they succeed in bringing the idea of wearable cameras to public interest because. well here is why :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HT8guwvZiWk I think gopro could do a better job than snapchat specially if itsn't tied to using the footage in a one dead slow buggy app specially on android

    ReplyDelete
  14. If I worked for snap, I would of called em Snaptecles.... but ok

    ReplyDelete
  15. Terrible idea. Pretty much spying on people without their consent/knowledge. If I see someone with them, I'll be turning away immediately. That's just uncomfortable af..

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1. They used a the keyhole design again. I get it tells people they're "Snapchat Glasses" but still it's a design that puts people off. Why not just release different designs?

    2. 16:9 videos and pictures would be nice too instead of circular videos. I have a friend who wants to use them for when he rides his motorcycle but soon as he heard it's tied down to only Snapchat's platform and uses only the circular format he passed.

    3. Should just automatically sync to your phone when connected to WiFi. They're supposed to be as convenient as possible. That's why some people pay the premium. But it won't even do that still.

    It may have corrected some issues but there's still a lot of issues to be corrected. I got Gen 1 for free lately and they're nice, however, if I'd have actually bought them I'd be pretty disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  17. can I use it without snapchat app?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I still don't like to watch the vids in that circular format, and I was hoping to see another frame at least

    ReplyDelete
  19. Casey Newton not Neistat but looks more like Neistat with the spectacles and stuff

    ReplyDelete
  20. Jeepers peepers wired/snap fans are 5G creepers.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If they were styled like Wayfarers or aviators, I'd consider it. I won't even buy these sunglasses because I don't like design. Seriously. I would NEVER wear those. They made one type for one specific face shape. Anyone who knows about glasses knows that you need different styles for different face shapes.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The problem is.. It's so damn ugly

    ReplyDelete
  23. MY NUMBER IS 999 CALL MY THE BIGS PIGS

    ReplyDelete
  24. While this is a newer and better product the controversy around snap is going to hold it back. One of the Kardashian doesn't use it anymore. Rhianna stopped using it. It user base was not happy with the new redesign. So those issues might hold the glasses back

    ReplyDelete
  25. Biggest problem is that videos don't export square or rectangular, so you're stuck with a video that only looks good on Snapchat. If they were to release a "Spectacles" app, designed to export square or rectangular videos to your phone, then I think they'd sell more, because even if you didn't use Snapchat, you might want to get some POV videos for your YouTube channel, or your IG account. ALSO, we should be allowed to plug the glasses up to our computers, so we can get the videos right from there. But with the circle video and the slow exporting, they're going to sell worse than the 1st gen, 100%
    (I own the first versions. I still use them once in awhile, I'll be bringing them with me the next time I go to Six Flags, because you can get some really nice roller coaster POVs, but I just export the video and upload them to my IG story..)

    I'm really hoping Instagram brings out their own, because I know they'd do it right, and maybe even add a "Go live" feature on them, which would be insane.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Why are they working on extra products when even their official app is slowly dying?

    ReplyDelete
  27. One problem is that the circular video is just annoying

    ReplyDelete
  28. and the resale begins in three...two...one...

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yeah, no these aren’t for me I already have a pair of spectacles that I never used😂😂

    ReplyDelete
  30. is not worth it, junk and waste of money.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Snaptacles wasnt a naming option?

    ReplyDelete
  32. My biggest issue with them is because of that weird video format. If they or anyone else does it in the standard wide screen format, I'd buy them in a heartbeat!

    ReplyDelete
  33. The problem with the Glasses are that it's still ugly and I can't really see anyone wearing it as an accessory

    ReplyDelete
  34. But do they work with instagram stories tho ?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Do you always have to physically touch the button on the glasses to turn on record? Sucks if so.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post
/*! templateifyMenu by Templateify | v1.0.0 - https://templateify.com */ !function(a){a.fn.templateifyMenu=function(){return this.each(function(){var $t=a(this),b=$t.find('.LinkList ul > li').children('a'),c=b.length;for(var i=0;i');}} if(h.charAt(0)==='_'){d.text(h.replace('_',''));d.parent().appendTo(m.children('.sub-menu'));}} for(var i=0;i');}} if(k.charAt(0)==='_'){f.text(k.replace('_',''));f.parent().appendTo(n.children('.sub-menu2'));}} $t.find('.LinkList ul li ul').parent('li').addClass('has-sub');});}}(jQuery); /*! templateifyThumb by Templateify | v1.3.0 - https://templateify.com */ !function(o){o.fn.templateifyThumb=function(n){return n=o.extend({onScroll:!0},n),this.each(function(t,c,e){var r=o(this),l=o(window),a=r.data("image"),h="w"+Math.round(r.width()+r.width()/ 10)+"-h"+Math.round(r.height()+r.height()/ 10)+"-p-k-no-nu";function s(){var o=new Image;o.onload=function(){r.attr("style","background-image:url("+this.src+")").addClass("templateify-lazy")},o.src=t} a.match("resources.blogblog.com")&&(a="undefined"!=typeof noThumbnail?noThumbnail:"//1.bp.blogspot.com/-rI4UCIrwEI4/YN3nGkf0nCI/AAAAAAAAAD0/DQ6fW7eCps8NL7S0oh374KFg1MsWUf2GQCLcBGAsYHQ/s72-c/ptb-nth.png"),a.match("blogger.googleusercontent.com")&&a.match("=")&&(e=a.split("="),a=e[1]&&""!=e[1].trim()?e[0]+"=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu":a),a.match("blogger.googleusercontent.com")&&!a.match("=")&&(a+="=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu"),t=a.match("/s72-c")?a.replace("/s72-c","/"+h):a.match("/w72-h")?a.replace("/w72-h72-p-k-no-nu","/"+h):a.match("=w72-h")?a.replace("=w72-h72-p-k-no-nu","="+h):a,1==n.onScroll?l.on("load resize scroll",function o(){l.scrollTop()+l.height()>=r.offset().top&&(l.off("load resize scroll",o),s())}).trigger("scroll"):l.on("load",function o(){l.off("load",o),s()}).trigger("load")})}}(jQuery); /*! templateifyTicker by Templateify | v1.0.0 - https://templateify.com */ !function(t){t.fn.templateifyTicker=function(){return this.each(function(){new class{constructor(t){this.ticker=t,this.active=0,this.tickerInit()} tickerActive(t){this.active=t,this.items.each(function(){this.classList.remove("active")}),this.items[t].classList.add("active"),this.tickerAuto()} tickerArrows(){this.ticker.append('
')} prev(){this.active>0?this.tickerActive(this.active-1):this.tickerActive(this.items.length-1)} next(){this.active *");const t=this.items.length;t&&(this.tickerActive(0),t>=2&&(this.tickerArrows(),this.tickerNavigation()))}}(t(this))})}}(jQuery); /*! jQuery replaceText | v1.1.0 - https://benalman.com/projects/jquery-replacetext-plugin */ !function(e){e.fn.replaceText=function(n,t,i){return this.each(function(){var o,r,l=this.firstChild,u=[];if(l)do{3===l.nodeType&&(r=(o=l.nodeValue).replace(n,t))!==o&&(!i&&/d){var a=c[0].children("li:last")[0];a&&c.unshift(t("<"+r+"/>").appendTo(a))}else c.splice(0,Math.min(d-e,Math.max(c.length-1,0)));t("
  • ").appendTo(c[0]).append(t("").text(n.text()).attr("href","#"+n.attr("id"))),d=e})})},e=t.fn.toc;t.fn.toc=n,t.fn.toc.noConflict=function(){return t.fn.toc=e,this},t(function(){n.call(t("[data-toc]"))})}(window.jQuery); /*! Javascript Cookie | v1.5.1 - https://github.com/js-cookie/js-cookie */ !function(e){var n;if("function"==typeof define&&define.amd)define(["jquery"],e);else if("object"==typeof exports){try{n=require("jquery")}catch(e){}module.exports=e(n)}else{var o=window.Cookies,r=window.Cookies=e(window.jQuery);r.noConflict=function(){return window.Cookies=o,r}}}(function(e){var n=/\+/g;function o(e){return u.raw?e:encodeURIComponent(e)}function r(e){return o(u.json?JSON.stringify(e):String(e))}function t(e,o){var r=u.raw?e:function(e){0===e.indexOf('"')&&(e=e.slice(1,-1).replace(/\\"/g,'"').replace(/\\\\/g,"\\"));try{return e=decodeURIComponent(e.replace(n," ")),u.json?JSON.parse(e):e}catch(e){}}(e);return c(o)?o(r):r}function i(){for(var e,n,o=0,r={};o1&&!c(n)){if("number"==typeof(f=i(u.defaults,f)).expires){var s=f.expires,a=f.expires=new Date;a.setMilliseconds(a.getMilliseconds()+864e5*s)}return document.cookie=[o(e),"=",r(n),f.expires?"; expires="+f.expires.toUTCString():"",f.path?"; path="+f.path:"",f.domain?"; domain="+f.domain:"",f.secure?"; secure":""].join("")}for(var d,p=e?void 0:{},l=document.cookie?document.cookie.split("; "):[],m=0,v=l.length;m